Federal Funding and Fetuses: Our pregnancies, our babies, and their future

In the past 5 years, the number of children born with birth defects on the Hawaiian island of Kaua’i has risen to 10 times the national rate.  The island is also where a handful of companies develop over 90% of the U.S.’s genetically modified corn. Of all the Hawaiian islands, Kaua’i is home to the largest percentage of indigenous Hawaiians.  Talk about the intersection of environmental and reproductive justice.   This article details the predicament and is well worth the read.

Kaua’i attempted to give residents some measure of protection from the extreme pesticide exposure on the island’s west side by issuing Ordinance 960,  requiring public disclosure of spraying times, locations, and chemicals present, as well as buffer zones around places like hospitals, schools, and day care centers.  You’d think this would be a no-brainer, common sense, something everyone would want in order to protect our children and our elderly.  However, after a challenge by Syngenta, Pioneer, Agrigenetics, and BASF Plant Science, a federal district court ruled the law invalid due to state preemption issues.   The case is currently on appeal thanks to persistent advocates Ka Makani Ho’opono, Surfrider Foundation, Center for Food Safety, Pesticide Action Network North America, and their Earthjustice attorneys.

Meanwhile, on the mainland, the U.S. Congress leads a special investigation into Planned Parenthood because the organization provides a legal service.

The investigation of Planned Parenthood is a sham.  It’s about people believing women shouldn’t be allowed to make their own decisions when it comes to their reproductive health.  I know this for many reasons, but here’s the reason I want to focus on right now: carrying a healthy pregnancy to term in many locations across America is a constant battle because legal environmental harms threaten that pregnancy almost constantly.

Where’s our special investigative committee looking into the folks causing the environmental contamination that terminates all those deeply wanted pregnancies?  Look up all the chemicals known to cause miscarriages and birth defects, look up where they are made, look up what they’re manufactured for, look at how shockingly prevalent they are in our lived environments– acutely so in some locations.  And look at who makes them.  Where’s our special investigative committee looking into them?

There is no special committee investigating whether Syngenta, Pioneer, and other agribusinesses are killing fetuses and causing babies to be born with life-threatening defects despite physicians in acutely affected areas suspecting a causal connection.  Syngenta and most of the agribusinesses of its stature get significant federal assistance in the form of loans, grants, tax breaks, and other subsidies.  Yet when agribusiness destroys fetuses and causes babies to be born with their organs on the outside, there is no congressional committee investigating whether the U.S. should take away these companies’ federal funding.

Those killing babies and fetuses while receiving federal subsidies aren’t limited to the agricultural sector.  This great reporting by Rolling Stone details how a midwife in Vernal, Utah is sounding the alarm warning that fracking is causing stillbirths, miscarriages, and birth defects in her community.  This issue isn’t only affecting those living near gas wells in Utah.  As the article details, we’re seeing this issue in communities affected by fracking everywhere.  The environmental effects of fracking kill fetuses, or have detrimental effects on their health to the degree that babies are born with a host of defects, or born without life at all.

I repeat: these corporations are highly subsidized by the federal government.

Evidently the federal government doesn’t care about the fetuses these particular federally-funded organizations kill.  It doesn’t care about the pregnancies they terminate. Or at least it doesn’t care enough to create a special investigative committee to look into the operations of federally subsidized oil and gas companies and agribusinesses.  The protestors with their right-to-life signs do not gather around the fracking wells, or outside the offices of the oil and gas companies that own them.

We are how we spend are time.  The U.S. Congress is spending its time investigating an organization that provides people with health care that, despite activists’ hardest attempts to get its employees to do otherwise, has consistently followed the law.  If the U.S. Congress cares so much about fetuses, I am ready to see it interested in protecting all the fetuses lost and threatened due to careless, irresponsible corporate action.  That is a legal starting place for protecting fetuses.  They could even pass some constitutional laws to protect all those fetuses currently harmed or destroyed by toxic chemicals from one industry or another.

The right to privacy protects a person’s decision to terminate a pregnancy.  When a physician at a Planned Parenthood clinic performs an abortion, that physician is respecting a private decision made by the pregnant person.

When a company’s irresponsible conducting of business operations causes a pregnant person to be exposed to toxic chemicals that harm the growing fetus, the company violates that person’s body and removes that person’s right of choice.  The company violates the pregnant person’s privacy and the health and safety of the fetus and the pregnancy.

The attack on Planned Parenthood is a sham.  If America cared about babies, the priority would be on giving them a healthy environment to grow up in, on ensuring that healthy environment is going to be here when our generation is long gone.  If America cared about babies, it would start holding polluters accountable.

And as for us- what can we do?  Tell our congresspeople we will not tolerate this.  Picket the people causing these harms.  MAKE THIS ISSUE PUBLIC.  Tell everyone your pregnancy, your sister’s pregnancy, your friend’s pregnancy, our babies should not have to put up with this crap.  There is serious work to be done here.  A chemical known to cause birth defects and miscarriages should not be coursing through our veins, should not be in our water, should not be in our food, should not be in our placentas and breasts, should not be in our babies’ umbilical cords.

Tell them this will be fixed, demand that it is fixed, demand the people causing the problem be held accountable, do not demand the products requiring these chemicals, find alternatives, demand alternatives.

This is urgent.  Our babies are growing up and we are letting the chemical industry continue to invade our bodies and this world.  This is urgent.  Our babies must have better.  We must do better.

2 thoughts on “Federal Funding and Fetuses: Our pregnancies, our babies, and their future”

  1. it is perfectly fine for this person to bring this to our attention (possibly at a national level, or for congressional intervention). It is horrible to think that this is going on. However, here is the inconsistency: why does she say repeatedly that the PP investigation is a sham? The CMP videos were done with the same thing in mind: to expose something horrible that is happening, to raise awareness, to raise the American conscience to do something. You can care about these babies (and presumably this author as well) AND care about babies who are being brutally butchered and sold by PP. But, you can’t simply care about one. You can’t say “this is so sad that these babies are born with defects in Hawaii” and NOT say anything regarding the brutality of abortion procedures and profiting across all 50 states. This is the inconsistency of the abortion agenda. She writes: “There is no special committee investigating whether Syngenta, Pioneer, and other agribusinesses are killing fetuses and causing babies to be born with life-threatening defects despite physicians in acutely affected areas suspecting a causal connection.” Fine, then perhaps there needs to be a special committee. Agreed. Babies should not be born with organs outside of their bodies. But, in ***JULY***when CMP started bringing VIDEO FOOTAGE before the eyes of any Americans who would watch, the organization was criticized, attacked and is now being sued by liberals who would like to support the ongoing killing of babies by PP who is happily raking in the money in the name of choice, rights, and science. This is not “suspecting a casual connection”–this is cold hard fact. This is proven by video after video, testimony after testimony. Consistency of care for babies must be consistency of care for babies. This is simply what people who are disgusted with abortion in this country want the other side to understand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *